Are Functional MRI Scans Not Functioning Right?

fMRI is one of the most popular ways to scan the human brain. A lot of those light-up brain photos you see? fMRIs. fMRIs work by measuring blood flow to different regions of the brain, which is a sign that…

fMRI is one of the most popular ways to scan the human brain. A lot of those light-up brain photos you see? fMRIs. fMRIs work by measuring blood flow to different regions of the brain, which is a sign that those parts are being used (that’s what’s lighting up in photos).

We’ve covered some especially interesting uses, like turning an fMRI on doctors to see if they empathize with patients’ pain, or a DARPA plan to screen dogs to pick out the smartest contenders. But a new paper from Stanford psychologists says those scans don’t always provide an accurate picture.

Since the scans just measure blood flow, don’t require patients to ingest a chemical or take a shot, which has made it a popular tool in neuroscience. One downside is that the data returned, showing the magnetic differences between oxygenated and deoxygenated blood, is messy. What’s retrieved from that gray matter needs to be interpreted, so scientists often use “spatial smoothing” to average out the activity they see. Problem is, that process can give too much weight to larger brain structures and not enough to the smaller ones. A “smoothing kernel,” an equation for evaluating noisy data, is often used in the process, but there’s an art to choosing the right equation, and a different kernel can give very different results.
fMRI Brain Activity :  Jan Hardenbergh
The researchers, for example, study the tiny nucleus accumbens structure and have used a 4 mm kernel. They’ve found in studies that the nucleus accumbens is split up into sections with different functions, but replications of their studies that used an 8 mm kernel may have been biased toward the larger rear section, meaning it looked like the activity was all based there.
When you’re dealing with the brain, that level of detail’s especially important, and this might change the way some research is done. Hundreds of papers from the last years, the researchers say, may need another look.

Previous Article: No, Architects, You Can’t Plant Trees On Top Of SkyscrapersNext Article: Amazing Videos Of Animals Catching Their Prey In Slow-Mo

To comment, please Login.

Popular Tags

140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Popular Science+ For iPad
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page

Download Our App
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing

Follow Us On Twitter
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed

March 2013: Rewiring The Brain
Our cover story: how neuroscience will fight five age-old afflictions. Plus more amazing looks at the brain, including the Army’s ambitious plan to battle PTSD and accidents that turn people into savants.
We also take you inside a burning rocket, to the top of the world’s tallest buildings, around the squishy robots of the future, and more.

Learn More

Join Now

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | EmailSenior Editor: Paul Adams | EmailAssociate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | EmailAssistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Contributing Writers:Rebecca Boyle | EmailEmily Elert | EmailKelsey D. Atherton | EmailFrancie Diep | Email
Intern:Shaunacy Ferro | Email

Today on


Copyright © 2012 Popular Science
A Bonnier Corporation Company. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


s.prop2=”colin lecher”
s.prop3=”fmri,mri,neuroscience,psychology,science,technology,the brain”
s.prop9=”Are Functional MRI Scans Not Functioning Right? ”
s.visitorMigrationKey =’51AB9FA2’
s.visitorMigrationServer =’’